X265 vs x264 file size. For example, my rip of Reservoir Dogs is 1.

X265 vs x264 file size. This is not a misconception, this is exactly what it is.

X265 vs x264 file size. 265/HEVC allows for even lower file sizes of your live video streams. I use medium just to get somewhat smaller file size. Everyone keeps saying "significantly" but when I encode with x264 and x265 i can only get about a 10-20% reduction using x265 over x264 before the x265 quality drops below the x264. But you don't want to see your movies and TV show at such low bitrate. Whenever i open a file in handbrake i don't see what original codec it is, only what codec i want it to use. 265. 265 HEVC can be done by either the CPU or the GPU. 2Mb/s means 900MB per hour. 10-20% smaller file size at the same quality should be a good estimation. Key Differences X265 is known for its high compression efficiency, allowing it to produce smaller file sizes at similar quality levels compared to X264. H. x265 has a bit smaller filesizes (~30% or so), but require more CPU to decode and is less widely available on media players (smart TVs etc. And the few groups that use the correct source suffer from it. 5GiB-6GiB range (depending on content). •. a change of ±6 should result in about half/double the file size, although your results might vary. How Lower Bit Rates Were Acheived: HEVC uses integer DCT. 265, H. 264. Camera Scene. ) and Intel QuickSync (IvyBridge, Coffeelake). 265 side-to-side comparison. Based on earlier tests, AV1 requires 3x the encoding time of HEVC x265 and LibVPx. x264; VP8; x265; VP9; Encoder quality versus file size efficiency, ranked best to worst: x265 and VP9; x264; Hardware encoders (AMD VCE, Intel QSV, NVIDIA NVENC) VP8; The x264 software encoder presents an excellent balance between speed and quality, and the H. 265-10b veryslow I get just noticeable degredation at CQ23, with BDs in the 1. x265 surely is not some magic wand (except on hdr 4k). Let’s get started. CRF = video quality and a higher preset will compress that stream better (keeping quality the same). Kekurangan x265 HEVC yaitu : lebih berat dari x264. Reply. In x265 slow produces higher quality at the same file size. For the same picture quality an x265 encode will be smaller file size than a x264, all other things being equal. Difference between H. RARBG was slightly better than YIFY despite being smaller, because x265 will give same quality as a x264 encode with 40% higher bitrate. Encoder Profile: Main 10. Yes. Again, no, it won't, or at least, it shouldn't. H265/HEVC is a video codec. and also if h265 is basically HEVC_NVENC for NVIDIA GPU acceleration. This produced a file that was around 3gb, but when looking at a few shots I was sure there was softening being applied. 265/HEVC (2013) and AV1 (2018) were introduced, all claiming significant improvement over H. Move the encoder preset as slow as you can tolerate (try a few short test encodes to see how it goes, generally each step is half the speed). Dec 27, 2017 · The claim that gets made is it is meant to deliver the same results as H. 264 files. x265 has better intra-prediction than x264 and I expect, FFV1, so lossless compression is more efficient. In practice though I mainly see 1-2GB x265 files. AVC is short for Advanced Video Coding, and the standard was first published in 2003. In other words, in order to produce the same quality image of VP9 or H. So 30% is a little low. Supposing that you're working with the latest stable release of handbrake 0. Dan itulah beberapa penjelasan mengenai perbedaan x264 dan x265 , semoga bisa Look at it this way: Higher efficiency in x265 means that a 1GB x265 will look better than a 1GB x264 video. Also x265 takes longer to encode. Video compression standard H. deblock affects quality: "Deblock work as a sort of filter that blurs out the edges of Dec 29, 2020 · Codec itu adalah penerjemah video agar dapat dibaca komputer, istilahnya kayak driver tapi khusus format media. For this one, we're using the following command: x264 --preset placebo --sar 1920:1080 Jun 15, 2023 · H. MOV: 23. Dec 25, 2023 · However, the actual file size difference can vary depending on the content, the encoding settings, and the specific implementation of the codec. HEVC expands the pattern and difference-coding areas from 16×16 pixel to sizes up to 64×64. For example, my rip of Reservoir Dogs is 1. 265 are more detailed and crisp than the images produced with H. some of the encoders undershot and the source files seems to be primarily composed of b frames. For 1080p Blurays these are h264 for 4K content h265. This makes it extremely difficult to choose compression settings to maximise quality vs file size. You just can't get that equal by using the same settings. You certainly can make a lower quality x265 file, but it will just have an even lower file size. Generally, you can use that x2 number to compare x264 with x265: this means a 5GB x265 file indeed should have higher quality than a 5GB x264 file, and about the same quality as a 5GB x264 file. HEVC scales better with higher resolution. 8GB. CTUs process information more efficiently, which results in a Jul 30, 2022 · I'm not sure if x264/5 use CPU and if h264/5 use GPU. If you want to save space, try x264 veryslow preset and x265 faster preset (should be roughly the same speed) at 5000 kbps and see what you think of the result. No, x265 doesn't have any work quality. Dec 2, 2022 · A ‘good enough’ quality-to-file size ratio x264 works well enough for 95% of the video content on the internet, and the bitrate/quality ratio it offers has been good enough to be used everywhere from Blu-Ray discs to Twitch streaming, for years now. x265 [info]: HEVC encoder version 2. 264/AVC. Nov 9, 2016 · I am working with x264 files to x265 and wanted to go faster. AVC uses the integer discrete cosine transform with 4×4 and 8×8 block sizes, HEVC uses integer DCT and DST transforms with varied block sizes between 4×4 and 32×32. 264, which means that it can transmit the same quality video using less bandwidth or storage. e. 265 Usage: 43% of video industry developers use H. Aug 29, 2016 · x264 is the most established open-source software encoder for H. x, the x265 version used is 1. Then adjust the RF target up a few points at a time until you find the quality vs size tradeoff that best suits your preference. I was looking for a tool that would allow me to see the codec used for all files in a folder so i can easily filter out the files already in X265 and select only those i still need to do. X264 can give a near-same file size as X265 with far better quality: This statement suggests that X264 can match X265's file size with superior quality. then using x265 will give a visually superior output than x264 will for the same bitrate. mkv are containers. PSA was better than RARBG, and it was noticeable. 265 provides more different tools to reduce bitrate. 264 supports more devices and browsers but less efficient in space, but h. On slower, it took 24 hours to encode, 12 hours longer than the constant Jul 23, 2013 · With that in mind, let’s take a quick peek at how pre-alpha x265 stacks up against the well-optimized x264. 0 version released the 13th of july has following 2 new features that you might love: rc-grain: Enables a new rate control mode specifically for grainy content. x265 is a much newer codec wich achieves smaller files while keeping the same quality. The difference is that the bigger one is encoded in x264 and the smaller one in x265 (HEVC). 23 is a good default for x264, and 28 is the default for x265. Encoder Preset: Slow. If your x264 is lossless (or close to it) and decide to go from x264 to x265. I do fair amount of reencoding bcos 1. It requires half as much bandwidth as H. Bit Rate Reduction: From 25-50% better data compression than H. According to the facebook page of x265 project, the 2. 5. Action Scene. Simplified: x265 will compress more so same bitrate x265 as a x264 should be the same quality but x265 be a smaller file size, but it's also harder to decode or transpose for things like plex. x264 or x265. Pixel Art Scene. I did small test with x265-8bit, CRF 22 to measure differences in bitrate, quality (SSIM) and encoding time. 264 dan H. I encoded the file slower and slower to try and maintain quality. 0938 PSNR: 50. But it's only to me. 264 encoding) quality will always be better at equivalent settings. I'd rather just buy another HDD. x265 is the technology successor to x264 (265 licensed 264 code) x265 is GPLv2; x264 is GPLv2. It's true if you're coming from any lossless codec, it's unlikely the OP is working from lossless masters. The negative is on the encoders side who has to spend more time encoding. MembersOnline. X264 and x265 (hevc) are formats for encoding. 5GB x265 in theory. x265 was first released in 2013; x264 in 2004. Apr 25, 2024 · HEVC is 25-50% more efficient than H. If you are sharing your library with other people, personally I would choose x264 for maximum compatibility and to avoid transcoding (and to reduce the impact of transcoding when it is Mar 1, 2020 · Assuming you're using libx265, you have to add -x265-params lossless=1 for true lossless mode (-crf 0 isn't). Click me -x264 (10900 kb/s) vs x265 (3931 kb/s)-Keep in mind that the x265 was actually transcoded from the x264 (the x264 is the source) so it's not really a fair comparison but even so I'm happy with the result. Example 2: Targeted File Size Oct 20, 2021 · Table 2. Using x265 means that you can get better quaity at the same file size or smaller size with the same quality. 8MB. Hard drives are cheap. Doing the exact same command with libx265 gives me a file size of only I started to encode another one of my TV shows. 3MB. In terms of file size, X265 tends to produce smaller files with equivalent or even superior quality to X264. For example a file which uses x264 vs x265 Hit YouTube for some good video examples Oct 25, 2017 · Here are the file sizes: 44 second video drone_landing. S. The constant bitrate file was 350mb and the smallest CRF file I could get was 699mb. 264 is their compression efficiency. Purpose: To provide good video quality at substantially lower bit rates than H. Personally I would use H. All other things being equal, it totally is. If you want a specific answer, then ask a specific, focused, question. 265 is how each processes information and the resulting video file size and bandwidth consumption used with each standard. To visualize those size differences Sep 13, 2016 · Sedangkan x265 adalah pengembangan dari x264 yang mengubah video ke format H. In practice, this may not always be the case. Regardless, the videos look better than my H. Caveat #1: In terms of playback hardware/software, x265 is not supported as widely as x264. IMPORTANT POINT: the quality slider on x264 and x265 are not on the same scale! What you discovered about x265 is true also of x264 but to a much lower extent - that is, an RF value for one configuration is not necessarily equivalent either in visual quality or file size to an RF value for another configuration, as different settings affect what a given RF value means in various ways. Not sure about when you get into compression w/ various codecs and whatnot. So a 2gb movie at x265 is much better quality than 2gb x264 movie. 264 and H. Comparison to the original file showed my suspicions to be correct. x264 and x265 are the encoders (that's the difference between h. heavily depends on the source and encoding settings. 265, CRF ranges from 0 to 51. 10. However, my x264 rips are still noticeably better even on 15" laptop WITH less file size. Media Serving. They have their own limitations and usually . It still has some of that H264 color banding issues well. But if you can't be swayed, x264 (which is software H. I used Simple x264/x265 launcher with command: --preset xxx --tune ssim --ssim. This considerably lowers the required bandwidth. Handbreak output is 321MB. The original file size is 140MB. 264 encodes and they're much smaller, like 60-70% of the file size. Original file is Bluray at around 9gb for 45 mins. Especially on a video card, that's literally just meant to get an acceptable quality stream across as fast and smoothly as possible in real time. This makes H. 265 included TrueHD passthru which is huge in size. 83GB and the x265 is 3. 996568 Which is not bad for this file size. This implies that HEVC files are roughly half the size of H. 264 vs. In reality, either could be better depending on the encoding settings. The input argument is the only positional argument, so it does not need to be last; x265 will recognize it as the only argument without a -marker before it. X246 taking quite a bit of space, 2. My per-title test suite has 23 files divided into Oct 10, 2019 · First, one must understand x265 is fundamentally different than x264. 264 processes frames of video using macroblocks, while H. The quality is always (relatively) garbage for the same size file done by a software encoder like x264/5. Test was done on 720p clip. Hardware encoding sacrifices quality for speed. However, it also depends on resolution. Resulting quality: VMAF: 96. So the x265 you're looking at has higher bitrate than the x264 file, that's why the size is bigger. x265 is an open-source HEVC encoder, originally ported So 10GB x264 will have better image quality than 3GB x265. All other setting being equal, I was under the impression that H. x265 is supported by most newer devices and has on your side no real negative. youtube. The 7MB is good. 0. 265 is more advanced and improved than H. 264, H. The efficiency of X265 makes it particularly suitable for 4K or higher resolution videos where storage space is a concern. Ideally if you have a remux file and compressed to x265 that would be ideal. x265 has full documentation online. 265 is newer and allows for the same quality to be used in a smaller file size (sometimes x264 files are bigger but not better). RARBG is grainy compared to PSA, but this is expected since it's larger. That takes CPU power, time, and writes to your HDD/SSD. x265 is going to be more efficient in terms of file size. HEVC compresses video in a more efficient manner than AVC Its a shame that most x265 groups micro-size the releases or use the x264 as source what results in low quality release. But it has its limits. That said, you may not notice any difference at all. In H. 264 for greater compatibility should you need to share an unaltered file with an insurer A common misconception is that a slower preset results in a smaller file. GPU: GeForce RTX 3090. Encoding Time: ~30 minutes. 265 codecs. Which means you can turn down the quality/bitrate setting - getting a smaller file that way - and still have the same quality result. Feb 25, 2024 · x265 is a newer video compression standard for HEVC/H. x264 and x265 are open source encoder implementations of the H. ChotCyle. This advice works for either x264 or x265. Mostly. I’ve been experimenting exporting using software x264 x265 encodes constant fr at quality 18-22 and the same with hardware (videotoolbox) encodes for 264 & 265. 265: Let’s get into the details. H265 (10bit): A version of H265. 265 is better than H. I had to set the quality to 30 to get the file size even close, any lower crf would give me a file between 900mb and 5gb. 264 format. If they're the same size, 1080p should be better, due to the much higher bitrate. 9. Mungkin ini karena mereka (para pembajak film ini) menggunakan x264 dan Start with the Fast 720p preset. 3. Question: I did some close up comparisons of the videos, and the quality of the x265 file is pretty comparable to what NVENC produced. I’ve since read on a forum that the quality level is not consistent between encoders. The rule of thumb is that 265 compresses down to half the size of comparable x264. 10-20% smaller files dont come close to making up for the significantly higher encoding time and much less supported playback. Jan 24, 2024 · Join us as we dissect the differences, weigh the pros and cons, and shed light on simplifying this choice. 265 (HEVC), according to Bitmovin, September 2019. In this paper, we present our evaluation of the performance of these compression Aug 3, 2016 · 1. x265 uses something akin to magic to pack in more quality in less file size. If you just want things fast, hardware accelerated codecs (like nvidia's) are much faster but have more artifacts at higher compression (i. When comparing images run at the same bitrate, both VP9 and H. HEVC (x265) is better in all regards except as people have said it requires modern hardware. 265 is more efficient in As you said though, if hardware doesn't matter go for the HDR-4k. This is not a misconception, this is exactly what it is. But it's a tradeoff between encoding speed, final size and quality. To put this into perspective, a 44-second 1080P video would demand about 22. Nov 22, 2021 · Compared to H264, same files with same settings will take upwards of 3 times longer to compress with single pass compression, and upwards of 5 times longer with dual pass compression. GB for GB the x265 should usually be better quality, but it entirely depends how it was encoded, and there’s no guarantee Eg a 5GB x264 file should be as good as a 3. They run on the CPU. 7 Mb/s. h. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. 10. 4. On an individual file vs file basis, though, it entirely depends on the settings. 264, both for encoding and broadcasting, while retaining the same video quality. x264 files are bigger, but don't require as much CPU to decode and is supported on almost every device sold in the past ~10 years. So 4k hevc has better compression than 720p hevc. If not, stick to 1080p. x264 dan x265 banyak kamu temukan pada nama file film download-an (alias bajakan). 264 would need to run at a higher bitrate. Summary: AV1 codec requires 3x the encoding time of HEVC/H. So its not so much about x264 vs x265 but how good is our eyes and screen we use. 1. New file size check (in case a broken encode makes it through this will fail out, looks for 40% to 110% of original file size) New file duration check (same as previous but with duration) Rename based on codec and resolution (needed so sonarr/radarr recognizes that the file is new and rescans it) Mar 13, 2024 · H. Dec 23, 2020 · Before HEVC / H. I think the confusion comes in that some streaming services only stream content in x264, so if Also, x265 takes significantly longer to encode, so if you are the one doing the encoding the smaller file size may not be worth the tradeoff. Subjective. GPUs with NVENC support can encode H. 265 ideal for high-resolution video formats such as 4K and 8K. If you only care about quality, set your crf and be done. For x264 (I've not looked at x265): -tune fastdecode is equivalent to --no-cabac --no-deblock --no-weightb --weightp 0 (My source is x264 --fullhelp) CABAC is lossless compression but provides ~15% file size reduction, so --no-cabac has no quality effect. This is supposed to be the low quality setting. x265 should compress to a smaller file size for equivalent video quality compared to x264, however x264 is more widely compatible with devices. May 15, 2022 · If you're rocking a newer 8-core or better, then forget the hardware encoders and use x264/x265 with a Medium or slower preset, as the speed difference isn't likely to be a big factor, and the slower presets will allow for improved efficiency. or heck, set the preset to 1, 'superfast'. While many elements decide the final file size, understanding which CODEC the file is using will help. P. There are 3 layers to this: container, format,and quality. Maybe because the question does not have good answers. They are proudly part of LibAVCodec that is used in applications like HandBrake, FFMPEG, and VLC. 265 and H. Over the last few years, a number of next-generation standards/formats like VP9 (2012), H. CRF 18 for x264 or CRF 24 for x265 should be visually transparent; anything lower will probably just waste file size. 1MB. The 1080p version takes 4. HEVC is the successor to H. x265 can beat x264 by a large margin at very low bitrate (~500kbps). 265 (x265) is newer and will give you better quality at the same size (bitrate) as H. It's also known as H265 Main10, and it's known for its higher fidelity. You can do the same for 4k but x265 vs AV1 (ignore x264) Full comparison between H. Advanced Video Quality. Re-run this file with -rc 2 and 6Mbps, resulting file size 10Mb - still puzzled what SVT means by bitrate. The file size is dependant on the bitrate. That's where they show up the easiest. Oct 16, 2023 · While blocks in H. Jan 29, 2024 · This is because H. Note that this is only true if you're starting from an h. 265 should look far superior, have yet to see a real world example to back that claim up though. However lack of predictability of the filesize makes SVT very diffucult to compare with anything H. As other posters have said, x264 and x265 are the names for the open source implementations of the two codecs. MOV: 467. HEVC gives you better quality at lower bitrates. The next ones will be AV1 and VP9 which should be even smaller once in regular use. Jadi x264 dan x265 bisa disebut encoder, sedangkan H. Unless your time and electricity are free, don't bother. 264 (x264). AV1 vs HEVC - Encoding/Decoding Time. A place to share, discuss, discover, assist with, gain assistance for, and critique self-hosted alternatives to our favorite web apps, web services, and online tools. MP4 . Encoder Level 5. Yes, that's basically correct. I replaced x265 build with 2. Which means it sacrifices quality to keep the Dec 7, 2022 · The main difference between H. In today's video I compare all of the major streaming encoders - X264 vs NVENC vs AMF/VCE vs www. 265 can achieve up to 50% more compression than H. In x264 slower is smaller. And if the x265 was made from the x264, then the x264 will be even better. 26*). com. 84 GB (2 330 kb/s, x264 8 bit) vs 3. It does take long tho, encoding 4k file like that is on average 8fps, while 1080p file goes from 50-80fps, cpu is 5700x. Experienced encoders don't care and just use whatever that suits their boat because well, it doesn't really matter much other than speed. MOD. In this case, we pass -for the input file, which tells x265 to use the piped output from vspipe. In x265, the slower the preset, the bigger the file size is at the same crf. r/selfhosted. The file size is proportional to the bitrate irrespective of encoding. 79 GB (4 998 kb/s, x265 10 bit). This guy recommends using the "faster" encoder preset but I still think I can see an improvement in using "medium". Not that I said efficiency, which basically means quality/file size. May 4, 2022 · H. 52. While counter intuitive at first, this is due to the more complex algorithms used to more precisely estimate motion and preserve details. 265 processes information using coding tree units (CTUs). 264/AVC video it creates is widely compatible with all modern devices. After far too many requests to updated my previous X264 vs NVENC and NVENC vs AMF/VCE videos with newer AMD Feb 12, 2023 · The last argument we are passing to x265 is the input file. All answers are not good. HEVC is a Licensed codec and hence not many browsers support it. 264/AVC was released in 2003, and has been dominating the industry for the past decade. 264 in half the space, by that logic at the same bitrates H. Using the library libx265 I am getting about 85fps when working on a file that is 720p, but if I use the nvenc_hevc I get around 600-700fps. 265 can use a complete range of blocks from 64x64 pixels all the way to 4x4, resulting in notably more efficient compression. It's not unexpected that a file half the size of x264 will look equivalent. Kelebihan x265 HEVC yaitu : ukuran lebih kecil tetapi kualitas tetap sama dengan yang x264 AVC. Shooters Scene. The h. But it takes more resources to decode. 265, and AV1 encoding capabilities in speed, file size, and quality for Jan 16, 2024 · 10 bit. 264 and can be considered a better option. The 4k version takes 5. To keep a very good image quality, the difference between x264 and x265 is not that important. 5 GB. So I have been researching the best method to back up my UHD collection to x265, and the general consensus for the past few years seems to be that you should use 10bit even if your source is 8bit. This was brought up on another thread, but I have one video I encoded at both 1080p with h. MOV: 22. 9GB. x265 is the CPU, and NVENC is the GPU. It will give "better quality at the same file size" or "equivalent quality at a lower file size" relative to x264. 265 (RF24). 4GB x264 video will not look the same as a 700mb x265 video, x265 will look worse. HEVC also demands higher computational power for effective data compression. From the table above, you can probably conclude that, in most ways, H. Here are the distinctions between x265 and x264 video coding and their respective advantages: x265: x265 is designed to provide better compression efficiency compared to x264. But really HEVC has been out for years and is the transition technology on H265 hardware encoding is worse quality than x264 slow - there are thousands of comparisons out there. some x265 release groups like PSA completely degrade quality to make file sizes smaller and then groups like QxR make a great effort to release high quality stuff but size isn't reduced as much. 264 produces a poorer image, particularly at lower bitrates. The short answer is the H. 53GB so that roughly a 64% reduction in filesize. Whether aiming for the sharpest 4K video or ensuring smooth playback on diverse devices, we have the insights to guide your decision. The main difference between these two codecs is that H. The savings from using the slow x265 preset rather than medium. Jun 6, 2020 · Welcome to the ULTIMATE video encoder quality analysis for 2020. Actually I would use h264 video format for best quality and small file size! x265 is a little bit better in quality and up to 25% in filesize, but very slow in encoding. It went from x264 to x265 for smaller sizes. The benefit is a lower file size and better quality, as the codec is able to better handle banding and other Bitrate isn't the whole story, the encoder settings have a lot to do with the result. 264 source file. . 264 were confined to 16x16 sizes to 4x4 sizes, H. 8MB it would occupy with H. Overall bit rate: 21. It achieves higher compression ratios by utilizing more advanced coding techniques, such as improved motion compensation, larger block sizes, and enhanced entropy coding a few notes, the source has an average bit rate of 12mb/s but the portion i cut is listed as 7mb/s and if you calculate the file size it is in fact 7mb/s so all my tests were done with the test encoders being set at average bit rate of 7mb/s. 264/AVC and results reported from standardization showed about 50% bitrate savings for the same quality compared to H. 264 (RF22) and the same video 4k with h. 27MB is not acceptable for a 20 second 720p video. My input file is 269M and when I use the nvenc_hevc it grows to 394M. 8171 SSIM: 0. Yeah, but difference between slow, very slow or medium are very hard to see. 1MB using HEVC, in contrast to the 58. 2160p will only look better because if the bitrate is higher than the 1080p one. 997988 MS SSIM: 0. Jan 20, 2023 · To me, h264 videos with a bitrate of 3Mb/s look good on a regular size TV, or h265 videos with a bitrate of 2Mb/s. 26* vs x. Caveat #2: x265 requires substantially more more processing time/power to encode So all else considered a 2gb x265 1080p is going to be higher visual quality than a 2gb x264 1080p. The x264 you'll notice has 2GB in the title. x265 is more or less state of the art. 0+52-6ee705ecb433 Mar 16, 2023 · The main difference between H. 265 encoding, offering better compression than x264, which encodes in the older AVC/H. So no, a 1. Constant Quality: 20 CQ. Part of the re-encoding process is to first decompress the file. I also tried downloading some films from various x265 10bit ripping groups, which are considered high quality releasers. 265, the standard was AVC / H. 265 adalah jenis codec yang dihasilkannya. Beyond the top-line bandwidth savings, the slow preset delivers a ladder with an overall bitrate of 5,300 kbps, a 26% savings over medium, and one fewer rung than medium, which will offset the increased encoding time. x265 is newer and more efficient wrt bitrate than x264. 265 would produce a smaller file. Oct 28, 2021 · 0. X265's compression efficiency often results in smaller file sizes for equivalent quality. [note that I was encoding in x264] Edit: I have one file that it makes sufficiently larger, despite the original being x264. here are some facts I've been able to learn in research and reading. Using GPU encoding, the processing will be done a lot faster but the file size might not be as small or the quality might not be as high (depends on if you focus more on quality or file size, based on the CQP value you set). See the show "Silicon Valley". 7:23 video raspberry_pi. File Size: 18. Even then, it will take a long time and a lot of CPU power to complete. 265 video. 1. mkv files are better for quality. smaller files). ) but is gaining a lot of traction. . 45 second slo-mo video asparagus_ninja. But imo x265 file maybe around 20-40% less than the size of comparable x264 is going to be similar in quality assuming all else is the same but it depends a lot on the content too, ex animation tends to compress better than live action with lots I used different programs in the last 5 years to convert different FullHD videos with x264, x265, NVEnc (Pascal, Maxwell,etc. At the end of encoding, x265 should print a line displaying lossless compression ratio. Resolution does too, below 4K x265 doesn't have much upside for a high quality encode. First attempt was using x265 10-bit, Medium preset, crf 20. The whole idea of data compression is to make the file smaller with the SAME quality. Like 33MB vs 7MB. If you interested in file sizes, x264 was 9. x265 8bit, 10bit, 12bit Confusion. It's supposed to be a replacement for the "old", but widely supported and used H264. talk2m3. th uf pb xp od hq au ci zm up